Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- xrvsmr [2025/03/03 20:09] – [WR18 vs MR18 vs Behringer Wing] wadmin
+++ xrvsmr [2025/03/03 20:26] (current) – [Going Onwards] wadmin
@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ==== Introduction ====
-This document proposes a test procedure and results comparing Behringer XR18, Midas MR18 and Behringer WING performance.
+This document proposes for this purpose
+  * a test procedure
+  * RAW measurements
+  * Test results comparing Behringer XR18, Midas MR18 and Behringer WING performance
+  * An XR18 filter configuration to compensate its frequency response
 ==== Disclaimers and Claims ====
@@ Line 23: / Line 27: @@
     * As a consequence, these results are (1) immune to critical failures on one channel but are (2) prone to specimen bias.
   * **Statement #3** : XR18 has two high impedance instrument inputs which MR18 does not have. For the sake of comparing apples with apples, Input 9/10 and Output 1/2 are used as references on both units.
+  * **Statement #4** : There is a 10 year gap between XR/MR design and WING design. Consequently, the analog part is significantly less noise-sensitive on WING which directly derives from the technology gap.
+    * As a consequence, comparison will focus on analog comparison ONLY, and will not take into account the difference in digital signal processing that units are capable of. The technological gap in this field is even greater (processing bit depth, algorithm quality, etc...).
 ==== Measurement Gear ====
@@ Line 123: / Line 129: @@
 Of course, you might need those EQ bands afterwards, it's just a modified starting point for those who want to have the sharpest start when configuring a setup.
+{{ :xmw:xr18_compensation_eq.zip |}}