User Tools

Site Tools


xrvsmr

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
xrvsmr [2025/03/03 19:57] wadminxrvsmr [2025/03/03 20:26] (current) – [Going Onwards] wadmin
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== WR18 vs MR18 vs Behringer Wing ====== ====== WR18 vs MR18 vs Behringer Wing ======
  
-This page aims at providing raw measurement datasets gathered to prepare this Comparison video: +This page aims at providing the procedure, raw measurement datasets and results gathered to prepare the following comparison video: 
  
 {{youtube>NYbtzWdxxuo}} {{youtube>NYbtzWdxxuo}}
Line 10: Line 10:
 ==== Introduction ==== ==== Introduction ====
  
-This document proposes a test procedure and results comparing Behringer XR18, Midas MR18 and Behringer WING performance.+This document proposes for this purpose 
 +  * a test procedure  
 +  * RAW measurements  
 +  * Test results comparing Behringer XR18, Midas MR18 and Behringer WING performance 
 +  * An XR18 filter configuration to compensate its frequency response
  
 ==== Disclaimers and Claims ==== ==== Disclaimers and Claims ====
Line 23: Line 27:
     * As a consequence, these results are (1) immune to critical failures on one channel but are (2) prone to specimen bias.     * As a consequence, these results are (1) immune to critical failures on one channel but are (2) prone to specimen bias.
   * **Statement #3** : XR18 has two high impedance instrument inputs which MR18 does not have. For the sake of comparing apples with apples, Input 9/10 and Output 1/2 are used as references on both units.   * **Statement #3** : XR18 has two high impedance instrument inputs which MR18 does not have. For the sake of comparing apples with apples, Input 9/10 and Output 1/2 are used as references on both units.
 +  * **Statement #4** : There is a 10 year gap between XR/MR design and WING design. Consequently, the analog part is significantly less noise-sensitive on WING which directly derives from the technology gap.
 +    * As a consequence, comparison will focus on analog comparison ONLY, and will not take into account the difference in digital signal processing that units are capable of. The technological gap in this field is even greater (processing bit depth, algorithm quality, etc...).
  
-Measurement Gear+==== Measurement Gear ====
   * UUTs   * UUTs
-    * MR18 S211000533C8H +    * MR18 S211000533C8H Firwmare 1.22 
-    * XR18 S201004255BI8 +    * XR18 S201004255BI8 Firwmare 1.22 
-    * WING 010063R0604AAE+    * WING 010063R0604AAE Firwmare 3.0.5
   * Tools   * Tools
     * Gen2 Apollo Twin USB     * Gen2 Apollo Twin USB
Line 101: Line 107:
 ===== Test results ===== ===== Test results =====
  
 +You'll find everything I used here. 
 +
 +
 +==== Presentation shared in the video ====
 +Open with Libreoffice or Powerpoint
 +{{ :xmw:xmw_presentation.zip |}}
 +
 +
 +==== dBFS ODS Spreadhseet ====
 +Used for normalised dBfs analysis (open with Libreoffice or Excel) 
 +{{ :xmw:xmw_normalised_spreadsheet.zip |}}
 +
 +==== RAW Data for you brave nerds ====
 +Opens with Room Eq Wizard tool:
 +{{ :xmw:xmw_rew_dataset.zip |}}
 +
 +===== Going Onwards =====
 +
 +Here is an XR18 EQ preset you can load which compensates the poor XR18 frequency response at 36dB Gain. 
 +
 +Of course, you might need those EQ bands afterwards, it's just a modified starting point for those who want to have the sharpest start when configuring a setup.
 +
 +{{ :xmw:xr18_compensation_eq.zip |}}
  
xrvsmr.1741031834.txt.gz · Last modified: by wadmin